Bridget grew up a Notre Dame legacy, and now she’s about to graduate from her father’s alma mater. One of her animated and lovely roommates is sitting to camera left as we shot, we had a great time bringing out the bubbly in her personality.![]()




















Bridget grew up a Notre Dame legacy, and now she’s about to graduate from her father’s alma mater. One of her animated and lovely roommates is sitting to camera left as we shot, we had a great time bringing out the bubbly in her personality.![]()






















Katz Eye is one of the leading brands of replacement focussing screen for digital single lens reflex cameras (dSLR). Today’s dSLRs ship with a stock focus screen that is optimized for auto-focus; Katz Eye lets camera owners replace this stock screen with one more suitable for manual focus. This is very helpful for photographers who are looking to move to manual focus Zeiss lenses, or photographers who work in low-light situations where their dSLR has a hard time keeping up on auto-focus.
The Katz Eye website is geared toward photographers who already know why they want one; the company is starting to realize, however, that there are a lot of photographers out there who don’t know about this split-prism focusing option, and they have plans to update their website with more information in the future.
I was nervous about installing the product myself, so before I ordered, I sent an email to customer service. I got a very detailed response almost immediately:
“The installation process isn’t too bad if you have a steady hand, good light, reasonable (or corrected) vision, and the patience to absorb all the available information in the installation guide,” emailed Rachael Katz. “It’s a bit tricky, as the screen is easily scratched and the handling tab is quite small (about 1.5mm x 3mm), and keeping things clean during the process is always a concern.”
Rachael said many of her customers also choose to send the camera to Katz Eye or a local installer for professional assistance, and that ultimately, only I could know what is best for my unique situation. “Hopefully you will find your questions answered, but if not, please let me know and I will do my best to clarify for you,” she said. Totally comfortable that these people stand behind their product and are available to help customers, I placed my order.
Not to be outdone by the Katz Eye users on Flickr who complete the process themselves without difficulty, I set aside a quiet morning and mustered the nerve to operate on my camera. The only change I made from the installation instructions was to use a pair of flat-nose pliers with smooth jaws rather than tweezers to grip the tiny tab — but then again, if I hadn’t been drinking a grande Americano, maybe the tweezers would have worked just fine.
The whole operation took about 5 minutes start to finish; my first test shot with my new split prism screen, focus aimed at the star over the Starbucks siren’s head:


Nikon D700, Zeiss 35mm lens, f2 @ 1/400 second, ISO 400
Since I’m first and foremost a portrait photographer, I should practice on people. And speaking of those I practice on most, they need to be picked up from school right about now, so I’m off.
Bottom line: I’d absolutely recommend this company and product. Here’s a link to another user who gave it [an artful] whirl.
UPDATE: Kate, here’s a very low-tech look through the viewfinder via my iPhone (onOne software app works, but it doesn’t capture the viewfinder details.) The split prism is a tiny circle in the center of the viewfinder between the “S” and “T” rendered in both focus and texture. If my iPhone phone quality were better, you could see the texture.


very low-tech look through the viewfinder via iPhone
5 comments
hmm… looks pretty good. wish i could see what it looks like through the viewfinder. was tough to translate the photos on that link.
just added the very low-tech photo to give you a rough idea; anybody out there know how to capture a Nikon viewfinder??? I think all of the ones I’ve seen online were shot with Canon, I’m not sure Nikon lets us?
that is sooooo bitchin! nice low tech solution. impressed the iphone cam pulled it off. thanks for giving a bird’s eye view!
![]()
Christine,
How do you find the non-prism area of the screen? Is it as bright as the original stock screen or is there a noticeable difference in brightness between the two. I look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
jsv
hi JSV! that’s a great question. I didn’t see any noticeable difference in brightness when I swapped my original stock screen for the Katz Eye. I’ve been so happy with it. if I wanted to, I could always put the stock screen back into my camera body, but I don’t know why I would. I’ve gotten quite attached to it.
this week, I’ve been using a Zeiss 18mm that I rented from from lensrentals.com (another company I’ve been very happy with) and using my Katz Eye with every frame.


The test shots surprised me.


Nikon D700, 35mm Zeiss lens, f4 @ 1/250, ISO 200


Nikon D700, 28-70mm lens at 35mm, f4 @ 1/250, ISO 200
Both images straight-out-of-the-camera (SOOC), no color correction or sharpening or enhancements. (The first image of Christopher holding up his running shoes was color corrected and run through my general filters.) Both acceptable, workable images, pulled back. The surprise? I totally expected the Zeiss prime to yield sharper results than the Nikon zoom, but a close-up crop of the eyes (where I was aiming my focus) clearly points to Nikon.


It’s harder to see side-by-side when the images get smaller on screen, so look again at Christopher’s eyebrows, the reflection of me in his sunglasses, and the line where his sunglasses meets the bright studio strobe, first in the Zeiss (where you can see my left hand turning the focus ring) and then in the Nikon (where my left hand is mostly needed to support the behemoth 28-70mm):


Zeiss 35mm


Nikon 28-70mm at 35mm
Aside from the chromatic aberrations, which Zeiss wins hands-down, I’m pretty sure hopeful? pointing out the possibility that what we’re seeing is operator error. For the last four years, the auto-focus Nikon has been my go-to lens, especially since I work so much with small children. When I picked up the Nikon to test on Christopher, I shot it using auto-focus. Perhaps I should have switched it over to manual focus for a more fair comparison; but then, I still think there’s something to say about results getting skewed based on the total number of hours I’ve spent working with each lens.
And there’s one more point that bothers me: 20+ years ago when I was shooting with manual focus lenses on film SLRs, the camera body had a split focusing screen. Remember those? My D700 has only a plain screen. I’m interested in a 35mm f/2 manual focus Zeiss precisely for those times when a D700 starts tripping all over itself to autofocus in low light.
Hmmm. A split focusing screen test might be next up in this summer Zeiss experiment.
P.S. I didn’t have the heart to tell him that sunglasses are counterproductive in Eugene!![]()
3 comments
I definitely think you should give the experiment another go. It looks like your focal points were actually in two different places. Look at the “o” on the temple piece of the glasses. On the Zeiss that was your main point of focus while on the nikon it was slightly behind that on his eyebrow.
I like you there in those counterproductive sunglasses. You’re the God of the machine.
it’s definitely operator error, Kate; I was aiming to focus on his eyes with the Zeiss, but I missed. I’m leaning toward getting a split-screen, thinking that would help equal the playing field for another experiment. but what are the chances I might find another young man who happens to whip out a Pac-10 shirt from one of my three schools???
Ray, if I were a reader who didn’t know any better, I might wonder if you aren’t smitten with me, you of all people placing me in a category like that.


I’ve gone from interested to infatuated to almost exclusively committed in just two short weeks. Both images below were shot with a Nikon D700, f2 @ 1/250 second, ISO 200. It’s not a true one-to-one comparison to my Nikkor as I only shot the Zeiss; I was in a hurry, testing bulbs and gear and batteries before a shoot this morning. I experimented with focusing on my son via distance (it’s not as bad as I would have guessed, given my knowledge of the metric system on the fly) and my daughter using my eye.






crop
It makes my Nikon 50mm feel like a tennis ball by comparison.
2 comments
wow! that second one was a crop??!!! awesome sharpness.
Amazing lens , if they’ll make it with autofocus i’m getting one.
Till then i’ll stick with my 50 Nikkor…
We spent the weekend in Annapolis with friends; this shot was taken on Main Street, just as we were leaving Nostalgia Cupcakes. Curious about the vegan cupcake, I asked what they substituted for eggs and milk. Their reply: chocolate.
Sold.
But as this is a photo blog, I should put down the to-die-for chocolate cupcake and get back to the Zeiss 35mm lens I’ve been experimenting with. It’s not as sharp as I was hoping it would be wide open (and/or at higher ISOs?), but I’m still getting to know it and am very encouraged by what I’ve seen in-studio at f/4. More on that as I finish editing last week’s stuff…


Nikon D700, Zeiss 35mm lens, f2 @ 1/8000 second, ISO 800
no comments
no comments