<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Composition &amp; Design Fundamentals with Lisa Semerad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christinegacharna.com/blog/2009/09/29/composition-design-fundamentals-with-lisa-semerad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christinegacharna.com/blog/2009/09/29/composition-design-fundamentals-with-lisa-semerad/</link>
	<description>a big easy photo blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 03:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine</title>
		<link>http://christinegacharna.com/blog/2009/09/29/composition-design-fundamentals-with-lisa-semerad/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christinegacharna.com/blog/?p=3293#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>that was one of my favorites, too; it lost points for being too close to the edges but otherwise it was &quot;legal&quot; (didn&#039;t violate the constraints of the &quot;closed system&quot; which was no points, etc.)  what she did with MOST of the work I turned in?  plucked it off the wall, turned it UPSIDE DOWN and put it back.  and then the class critique agreed it finally worked!  I&#039;m still trying to wrap my brain around that, how my straight-up efforts are better when turned upside down.  I don&#039;t know how to think backwards and upside down (I think that&#039;s a &quot;spatial&quot; trait of pilots and architects, people who don&#039;t get lost and turned around like I do) but I&#039;m wondering if it can be learned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was one of my favorites, too; it lost points for being too close to the edges but otherwise it was &#8220;legal&#8221; (didn&#8217;t violate the constraints of the &#8220;closed system&#8221; which was no points, etc.)  what she did with MOST of the work I turned in?  plucked it off the wall, turned it UPSIDE DOWN and put it back.  and then the class critique agreed it finally worked!  I&#8217;m still trying to wrap my brain around that, how my straight-up efforts are better when turned upside down.  I don&#8217;t know how to think backwards and upside down (I think that&#8217;s a &#8220;spatial&#8221; trait of pilots and architects, people who don&#8217;t get lost and turned around like I do) but I&#8217;m wondering if it can be learned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate gardiner photography</title>
		<link>http://christinegacharna.com/blog/2009/09/29/composition-design-fundamentals-with-lisa-semerad/comment-page-1/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>kate gardiner photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christinegacharna.com/blog/?p=3293#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>the last one is my favorite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the last one is my favorite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

