<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOOC Nikon 28-70mm AF vs. Zeiss 35mm manual focus lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christinegacharna.com/blog/2009/08/26/sooc-nikon-28-70mm-af-vs-zeiss-35mm-manual-focus-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christinegacharna.com/blog/2009/08/26/sooc-nikon-28-70mm-af-vs-zeiss-35mm-manual-focus-lens/</link>
	<description>a big easy photo blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 03:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine</title>
		<link>http://christinegacharna.com/blog/2009/08/26/sooc-nikon-28-70mm-af-vs-zeiss-35mm-manual-focus-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christinegacharna.com/blog/?p=3057#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s definitely operator error, Kate; I was aiming to focus on his eyes with the Zeiss, but I missed.  I&#039;m leaning toward getting a split-screen, thinking that would help equal the playing field for another experiment.  but what are the chances I might find another young man who happens to whip out a Pac-10 shirt from one of my three schools???  :)

Ray, if I were a reader who didn&#039;t know any better, I might wonder if you aren&#039;t smitten with me, you of all people placing me in a category like that.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s definitely operator error, Kate; I was aiming to focus on his eyes with the Zeiss, but I missed.  I&#8217;m leaning toward getting a split-screen, thinking that would help equal the playing field for another experiment.  but what are the chances I might find another young man who happens to whip out a Pac-10 shirt from one of my three schools???  <img src='http://christinegacharna.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ray, if I were a reader who didn&#8217;t know any better, I might wonder if you aren&#8217;t smitten with me, you of all people placing me in a category like that.  <img src='http://christinegacharna.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://christinegacharna.com/blog/2009/08/26/sooc-nikon-28-70mm-af-vs-zeiss-35mm-manual-focus-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christinegacharna.com/blog/?p=3057#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>I like you there in those counterproductive sunglasses. You&#039;re the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/special/threewomen/god-machine.html&quot;&gt;God of the machine.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like you there in those counterproductive sunglasses. You&#8217;re the <a href="http://www.cato.org/special/threewomen/god-machine.html">God of the machine.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate gardiner photography</title>
		<link>http://christinegacharna.com/blog/2009/08/26/sooc-nikon-28-70mm-af-vs-zeiss-35mm-manual-focus-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>kate gardiner photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christinegacharna.com/blog/?p=3057#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>I definitely think you should give the experiment another go. It looks like your focal points were actually in two different places. Look at the &quot;o&quot; on the temple piece of the glasses. On the Zeiss that was your main point of focus while on the nikon it was slightly behind that on his eyebrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely think you should give the experiment another go. It looks like your focal points were actually in two different places. Look at the &#8220;o&#8221; on the temple piece of the glasses. On the Zeiss that was your main point of focus while on the nikon it was slightly behind that on his eyebrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

